03 · Drill 02 — Surface the Real Problem
Status: Outline. Body fills in Week 2. Voice: principal-level, BFSI-threaded, Apic-calibrated.
What this drill is. Five customer requests, each containing a hidden real problem. Drill: in 90 sec each, ask 3 probing questions that get from the requested AI feature to the underlying business problem.
What this drill is NOT. A solutioning drill. Don't propose architecture during this drill.
Prompts (5 customer asks)
Ask 1 — "We want Claude to write our compliance reports."
Hidden real problem (don't peek): Auditor finds inconsistencies between sections. Underlying need is structured drafting + consistency-checking with review gates, not free-form generation.
Ask 2 — "We want a chatbot for relationship managers to query customer data."
Hidden real problem: RMs spend 30% of their time switching between 5 systems to assemble a customer 360. Underlying need is integration + UX, not a chat interface.
Ask 3 — "We want Claude to do contract review."
Hidden real problem: Legal team has a 3-week backlog and the bottleneck is triage — which contracts need detailed review. Underlying need is classification + routing, not full review.
Ask 4 — "We want a Claude agent to handle vendor onboarding."
Hidden real problem: Onboarding fails because 4 internal teams pass forms that contradict each other. Underlying need is process redesign, not automation; Claude can help draft, but the process problem is upstream.
Ask 5 — "We want Claude to summarize all our internal Slack channels."
Hidden real problem: Leadership doesn't know what's happening across 12 product teams. Underlying need is structured weekly briefs from team leads, not Slack summarization (which would surface noise + leak signal).
Time box
- Per ask: 90 sec to deliver 3 probing questions.
- Total drill: ~10 min including reading the asks cold.
Rubric
Strong Hire
For each ask: - 3 questions delivered, each in a different class (context / problem-surface / constraint). - At least one question that refuses the surface framing without being adversarial. ("If the AI piece weren't part of this, how would you solve this problem today?") - Identifies the real problem before offering any architecture. - No competitor comparison anywhere.
Hire
- 3 questions delivered but all in the same class (e.g. all "what" questions).
- Real problem surfaces but only because the prompt obviously hints at it.
Lean No
- Architect immediately offers solution architecture (Lean No).
- Questions are pitch-shaped ("would Claude be useful for…?").
- Surface ask accepted as the requirement.
Strong No
- Architect skips probing entirely and pitches Claude features.
- "Yes we can definitely do that" said without further investigation.
The 3-question template
The Strong-Hire structure for any customer ask:
- Context question — "Walk me through what's happening today before any AI gets involved."
- Problem-surfacing question — "What's the business outcome you're chasing? What would success look like in 6 months?"
- Constraint or counter-factual question — one of:
- "If the AI piece weren't part of this, how would you solve this problem?"
- "What did the previous attempt teach you?"
- "Who has to sign off before this goes live?"
If all 3 questions land, the customer surfaces the real problem in their own words.
Common Lean No traps
Trap 1 — Solution-shaped questions
"Would Claude help if it could…" — that's a pitch disguised as a question. Lean No.
Trap 2 — Single-class questioning
3 "what" questions in a row. The constraint and counter-factual classes never get used. Real problem doesn't surface.
Trap 3 — Accepting the AI framing
Treating "we want Claude to X" as the requirement. The requirement is the outcome, not the AI shape.
Trap 4 — Over-leading
"It sounds like what you actually need is…" — finishing the customer's thought for them. They'll agree to be polite, then disagree internally.
Trap 5 — Skipping to constraints
Constraint questions before context questions. Sounds like an audit, not discovery.
How to run this drill
- Cover the "hidden real problem" lines.
- Read each ask cold; deliver 3 probing questions in 90 sec.
- Reveal the hidden problem after answering.
- Score: did your questions, in their own logic, surface the hidden problem?
- For asks where you missed, write the one question you should have asked.
- Application trigger: 4 of 5 asks graded Strong Hire across 2 sessions.
Cross-references
- Note: 01 — Discovery Call Structure — the question taxonomy.
- Sibling drill: 01 — Discovery Call Simulation — applies the same skill end-to-end.
- Drill Tracker.
Strong-Hire bar for this drill
- 3 questions per ask, in 3 different classes, in 90 sec.
- Real problem surfaces in customer's own words.
- No solutioning during the drill.
- 4 of 5 Strong Hires across 2 sessions.